Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts

Senators write Sony, criticize 'Zero Dark Thirty'

WASHINGTON (AP) — The movie "Zero Dark Thirty" is misleading and "grossly inaccurate" in its suggestion that torture produced the tip that led the U.S. military to find terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, three senators said Wednesday in a letter to the head of Sony Pictures Entertainment.

The filmmakers dispute that interpretation and encourage people to see their movie, already considered a top Oscar contender, before characterizing it.

The members of the Senate Intelligence committee — Dianne Feinstein, Carl Levin and John McCain — insisted that Sony and its president and CEO, Michael Lynton, had an obligation to alter the movie and make clear that torture in the hunt for bin Laden was fiction and not based on fact.

"We are fans of many of your movies, and we understand the special role that movies play in our lives, but the fundamental problem is that people who see 'Zero Dark Thirty' will believe that the events it portrays are facts," the three senators wrote. "The film therefore has the potential to shape American public opinion in a disturbing and misleading manner."

McCain has insisted that the waterboarding of al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, did not provide information that led to the bin Laden's compound in Pakistan.

Last year, McCain asked then-CIA Director Leon Panetta for the facts, and he said the hunt for bin Laden did not begin with fresh information from Mohammed. In fact, the name of bin Laden's courier, Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, came from a detainee held in another country.

Feinstein, who heads the Intelligence committee, backed up McCain's assessment that waterboarding of Mohammed did not produce the tip that led to bin Laden.

In their letter to Sony, the lawmakers said the "use of torture in the fight against terrorism did severe damage to America's values and standing that cannot be justified or expunged. It remains a stain on our national conscience. We cannot afford to go back to these dark times, and with the release of 'Zero Dark Thirty,' the filmmakers and your production studio are perpetuating the myth that torture is effective. You have a social and moral obligation to get the facts right."

Director Kathryn Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal said in a statement from Sony that they depicted "a variety of controversial practices and intelligence methods that were used in the name of finding bin Laden."

Bigelow and Boal, who won Oscars for "The Hurt Locker," said the new film showed that no single method was responsible in the successful manhunt for bin Laden, and no single scene in isolation captures the total effort the movie dramatizes.

McCain said he watched the movie Monday night after receiving a copy.

"Zero Dark Thirty" is opening in New York and Los Angeles this week. It opens across the country next month.
Read More..

Arnold Schwarzenegger's "Ten" to kick off 2014

LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) - Open Road Films will release Arnold Schwarzenegger's action thriller "Ten" nationwide on January 24, 2014, the company announced on Wednesday.

Directed by David Ayer ("End of Watch"), the former governor leads an elite DEA task force that takes on the world's deadliest drug cartels.

When the team executes a high-stakes raid on a cartel safe house, they think their work is done until, one-by-one, the 10 members start to be eliminated.

The film also stars Joe Manganiello, Sam Worthington, Harold Perrineau, Terrence Howard, Max Martini, Josh Holloway, Olivia Williams and Mireille Enos.

The original "Ten" screenplay is by Skip Woods ("X-Men Origins: Wolverine"). Bill Block, Paul Hanson, Joe Roth, Palak Patel and Al Ruddy produced the film.

Financing was by QED International.
Read More..

'Zero Dark Thirty' Is Now Officially Wrong About Torture

We already knew that Zero Dark Thirty messed up a couple of details about the bin Laden raid, but now, some senators would like the filmmakers to know they're straight up "incorrect." More specifically, Senators Diane Feinstein, Carl Levin and John McCain wrote in a letter addressed to Michael Lynton, chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures, that "Zero Dark Thirty is factually inaccurate, and we believe that you have an obligation to state that the role of torture in the hunt for Usama Bin Laden is not based on the facts, but rather part of the film's fictional narrative." They go on to say that the film encourages the minority of Americans who favor torture as an intelligence gathering technique. "This is false," the letter reads. "We know that cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of prisoners is an unreliable and highly ineffective means of gathering intelligence."

RELATED: Members of Congress Mull Over Looking at Bin Laden's Death Photo

This is hardly the cut-and-dry issue the senators make it out to be, though. Ever since the initial details of what Glenn Greenwald called a White House "propaganda film," critics and pundits alike have been jousting over the scenes that depict torture. Mother Jones's Adam Serwer said as much as the senators' letter does about the film's potential for changing Americans' mind about torture. That is, if they think torture helped us find bin Laden, they'll probably think torture is a good thing. Greenwald said in a separate column that the film propagandizes the public to favorably view clear war crimes by the US government, based on pure falsehoods." (He loves the "p" word.) Critics of the critics said that torture happened, the film is fiction and, furthermore, most Americans haven't even seen the film, so who are we to say what they'll think. You can read more about these issues in our handy guide to the Zero Dark Thirty debate.

RELATED: Legislation Congress Wants After Bin Laden's Death

On a pretty fundamental level, though, Wednesday evening's letter is a pretty assertive gesture from the senators. And it's a gesture that Sony Pictures probably ought to respond to, especially in light of other developments in the Zero Dark Thirty controversy, like that tricky situation in which the Pentagon leaked sensitive information to the filmmakers. The rest of us are free to continue arguing about whether or not the torture in the film is warranted and even whether or not the government is lying when they say that torture didn't provide any clues about bin Laden's location. (The senators do provide a lot of evidence for their claim, however.) Zero Dark Thirty's filmmakers, however, now have to work within the reality that is an official letter from the Senate. Their film is now officially factually inaccurate. It should blend in nicely with the rest of the world's films that are "based on first-hand accounts of actual events." 
Read More..

China's airing of 'V for Vendetta' stuns viewers

BEIJING (AP) — Television audiences across China watched an anarchist antihero rebel against a totalitarian government and persuade the people to rule themselves. Soon the Internet was crackling with quotes of "V for Vendetta's" famous line: "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."

The airing of the movie Friday night on China Central Television stunned viewers and raised hopes that China is loosening censorship.

"V for Vendetta" never appeared in Chinese theaters, but it is unclear whether it was ever banned. An article on the Communist Party's People's Daily website says it was previously prohibited from broadcast, but the spokesman for the agency that approves movies said he was not aware of any ban.

Some commentators and bloggers think the broadcast could be CCTV producers pushing the envelope of censorship, or another sign that the ruling Communist Party's newly installed leader, Xi Jinping, is serious about reform.

"Oh God, CCTV unexpectedly put out 'V for Vendetta.' I had always believed that film was banned in China!" media commentator Shen Chen wrote on the popular Twitter-like Sina Weibo service, where he has over 350,000 followers.

Zhang Ming, a supervisor at a real estate company, asked on Weibo: "For the first time CCTV-6 aired 'V for Vendetta,' what to think, is the reform being deepened?"

The 2005 movie, based on a comic book, is set in an imagined future Britain with a fascist government. The protagonist wears a mask of Guy Fawkes, the 17th-century English rebel who tried to blow up Parliament. The mask has become a revolutionary symbol for young protesters in mostly Western countries, and it also has a cult-like status in China as pirated DVDs are widely available. Some people have used the image of the mask as their profile pictures on Chinese social media sites.

Beijing-based rights activist Hu Jia wrote on Twitter, which is not accessible to most Chinese because of government Internet controls: "This great film couldn't be any more appropriate for our current situation. Dictators, prisons, secret police, media control, riots, getting rid of 'heretics' ... fear, evasion, challenging lies, overcoming fear, resistance, overthrowing tyranny ... China's dictators and its citizens also have this relationship."

China's authoritarian government strictly controls print media, television and radio. Censors also monitor social media sites including Weibo. Programs have to be approved by the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, but people with knowledge of the industry say CCTV, the only company with a nationwide broadcast license, is entitled to make its own censorship decisions when showing a foreign movie.

"It is already broadcast. It is no big deal," said a woman who answered the phone at movie channel CCTV-6. "We also didn't anticipate such a big reaction."

The woman, who only gave her surname, Yang, said she would pass on questions to her supervisor, which weren't answered.

The spokesman for the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television said he had noticed the online reaction to the broadcast. "I've not heard of any ban on this movie," Wu Baoan said Thursday.

The film is available on video-on-demand platforms in China, where movie content also needs to be approved by authorities.

A political scientist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences who used to work for CCTV said the film might have approval, or it could have been CCTV's own decision to broadcast it.

"Every media outlet knows there is a ceiling above their head," said Liu Shanying. "Sometimes we will work under the ceiling and avoid touching it. But sometimes we have a few brave ones who want to reach that ceiling and even express their discontent over the censor system.

"It is very possible that CCTV decided by itself" to broadcast the film, Liu said. If so, he added, it would have been "due to a gut feeling that China's film censorship will be loosened or reformed."

"V for Vendetta" was released in the United States in 2005 and around the world in 2006. China has a yearly quota on the numbers of foreign movies that can be imported on a revenue share basis, making it tough to get distribution approval. Other movies that failed to reach Chinese screens in 2006 include "Brokeback Mountain" and "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest." Chinese moviegoers that year were able to see "Mission: Impossible III" with Tom Cruise and "The Painted Veil," which was filmed in China and set in a Chinese village.

Warner Brothers, which produced and distributed "V for Vendetta," declined to comment.

China doesn't have a classification system, so all movies shown at its cinemas are open to adults and children of any age. A filmmaker and Beijing Film Academy professor, Xie Fei, published an open letter on Sina Weibo on Saturday calling for authorities to replace the movie censorship system that dates from the 1950s with a ratings system.

The airing of "V for Vendetta" raised some hopes about possible changes under Xi, who was publicly named China's new leader last month. He has already announced a trimmed-down style of leadership, calling on officials to reduce waste and unnecessary meetings and pomp. His reforms are aimed at pleasing a public long frustrated by local corruption.

State media say they have reduced reports on officials' trips as part of this drive. The official Xinhua News Agency warned this week that media outlets should "learn to play professionally in today's information age as an increasingly picky audience is constantly" putting them under scrutiny.

An American business consultant and author with high-level Chinese contacts said there is no less commitment to one-party rule in China, so any media reforms will only go so far.

"You can't have a totally free media as we would have in the West and still maintain the integrity of a one-party system," said Robert Lawrence Kuhn, who wrote the book "How China's Leaders Think." He said he thinks restrictions are being eased, "but it has to be limited."

The new leadership has to tread carefully, Kuhn said, because in the age of the Internet, talk about reforms won't be forgotten.

"High expectations, if they are not fulfilled, will create a worse situation," he said.
Read More..

2012 London Film Awards Announces Winners

"Beauty and the Breast" directed by Liliana Komorowska wins the London Film Awards’ top prize, the Gold Lion Award and Grand Jury Prize. “Womble” directed by Robert Pirouet wins the competition’s Special Jury Award.

London, UK (PRWEB) December 20, 2012
Jury Prizes and top award-winners of the 2012 London Film Awards were announced December 17th, 2012. The London Film Awards is London’s premiere film awards body which celebrates and awards the work of independent film's best and brightest contemporary filmmakers and screenwriters spanning the globe. The Official Jury selected one exclusive Gold Lion Award Winner for each official competition category, the awards’ highest and most esteemed honors. A full list of the 2012 winners can be found at the competition’s official website, http://www.londonfilmawards.com.

“Our 2012 competition marks an incredible year for the London Film Awards. LFA received submissions representing some of the world’s most talented filmmakers. After careful consideration, we have distilled the very best of this year’s entries,” said Joey Paulos, Executive Director of the London Film Awards. “We are honored to celebrate the talent and commitment of each of these accomplished artists.”

The Grand Jury Prize was presented to Beauty and the Breast directed by Liliana Komorowska (Canada).


Synopsis: A first-time documentary filmmaker offers a compelling insight into the devastating reality of breast cancer, as seen through the eyes of several female patients helping demystify the deadly disease while painting poignant and often humorous intimate.

The Special Jury Prize was presented to Womble directed by Robert Pirouet (United Kingdom).


Synopsis: Years have passed and what's changed? Jim Labey sits waiting in the corridor of his old school waiting for a job interview. The problem? The other side of the desk is Piers Mourant, an old classmate of Jim's...and Pier's remembers everything!

The Best Feature Film was presented to Pechorin directed by Roman Khrushch (Russia).


Synopsis: Based on the Russian classic Mikhail Lermontov novel “The Hero of Our Time”. All events shown as they are reflected in the mind of the dying hero, as a series of irrevocable mistakes and interpreted anew: it is either reconsideration or repentance.

The Best Short Film was presented to Dissarray directed by Chandradeep Das (India).


Synopsis: A day in the life of an obsessed loner whose immaturity and emotional isolation lead to dynamic imbalances in his life, driving him even to a point where he considers killing the girl.

The Best Animated Film was presented to Seasons directed by Haowei Hu (USA).


Synopsis: Seasons, is a surreal motion graphics animation based on the changing seasons. Beginning with spring, the richly hued illustrations in this work come alive as they transform in color and rhythmic tempo to reveal the full seasonal spectrum.

The Best Documentary Short was presented to Ian Wright / Nothing to Something directed by Marcel Beckford (United Kingdom).


Synopsis: This detailed account documents the rise of a young black boy from the harder side of South East London, who rose through all adversity to become the highest scoring player for Arsenal Football Club.

The Best Screenplay was presented to One of These Things is Not Like the Others directed by Adam Wilson (USA).


Synopsis: Josh, a NYC grad student, surprises his southern conservative family at Thanksgiving when he brings home his African-American boyfriend.

The Best Experimental Film was presented to The Color of Time directed by Anthony Szulc (USA).


Synopsis: The Color of Time, a collaboration between painter/sculptor Carol Brown Goldberg and filmmaker Anthony Szulc is an 11 minute 'Documoir' exploration of color, memory, art, history, family, poetry, and human imagination.

The Best British Film was presented to Turn a Blind Eye directed by Harold Salakianathan (United Kingdom).


Synopsis: A city trader incriminates himself amidst the protests against the global financial crisis.

The Best Director was presented to Aurelia directed by Victor Ghizaru (Canada).


Synopsis: Aurelia embarks on a journey to find her father. Cut off from the world, she naïvely discovers simple things that marvel her infant spirit. A peaceful story about self-discovery, taking place in the empty fields of a forgotten land.

The Cinematic Vision Award was presented to Ghost Track directed by Fabrizio Rossetti (Spain).


Synopsis: Isabel is a cleaner who dreams of being a singer. She owns an Ipod, within which there are six women, each of whom, like Isabel, represent a musical note. Each woman is the protagonist of a different story connected to the path Isabel must take.

The Best Web Video was presented to Ian Wright / Nothing to Something directed by Marcel Beckford (United Kingdom).


Synopsis: This detailed account documents the rise of a young black boy from the harder side of South East London, who rose through all adversity to become the highest scoring player for Arsenal Football Club.

The Best Comedic Film was presented to Womble directed by Robert Pirouet (United Kingdom).


Synopsis: Years have passed and what's changed? Jim Labey sits waiting in the corridor of his old school waiting for a job interview. The problem? The other side of the desk is Piers Mourant, an old classmate of Jim's, and Pier's remembers everything.

The Best First-Time Director was presented to Beauty and the Breast directed by Liliana Komorowska (Canada).


Synopsis: A first-time documentary filmmaker offers a compelling insight into the devastating reality of breast cancer, as seen through the eyes of several female patients helping demystify the deadly disease while painting poignant and often humorous intimate

Feature Screenplay Competition Winners

Grand Prize Winner was awarded to Russian Cross written by Brian Moniz.

Second Place Screenplay was awarded to Safewood written by Zoe Mavroudi.

Third Place Screenplay was awarded to Seeing Red written by Sundae Jahant-Osborn.

Fourth Place Screenplay was awarded to Smilers written by Mike McGeever.

Fifth Place Screenplay was awarded to Crater written by Luke Pimental.

Short Screenplay Competition Winners

First Place Screenplay was awarded to El Jardinero written by Stefano Valentini.

Second Place Screenplay was awarded to Path written by Michael Wright.

Third Place Screenplay was awarded to GodsStorm written by Loren Sterman.

The Best Stage Play was presented to The City of Burning Bridges written by Ivana Jajalo.

The Best First-Time Screenwriter was presented to Sea Fever written by Neasa Hardiman.

The Best Television Pilot was presented to Grey Matters written by Ian Longacre.

About the London Film Awards:


As a distinguished international film competition, the London Film Awards celebrates and awards independent film's best and brightest talent spanning the globe. The London Film Awards places an emphasis on exclusivity and recognizes and awards only the most finely produced films and screenplays with honors. The Grand Prize Winners of each official competition category, as determined by our Official Jury, each receive the coveted Gold Lion Award as commemoration of their exemplary achievements. Additionally, the London Film Awards offers various Special Achievement Awards for standout productions.
Read More..